fbpx

The Real Story of Windshields and UV. We Got It Wrong.

An AGEIST reader makes us rethink those driving gloves

We get things wrong sometimes. Not often, but when we do, we have highly informed readers who set us straight.

We had previously stated in our “3 Things We Like” that UV goes through car windshields and this causes the skin on one’s hands to be at risk of sun damage.

We were wrong.

It took Bill A only a few minutes to send us this:

Just a comment on the link in this round’s email titled, Driving Anti UV Gloves. The statement it makes that “The car windshield does nothing to block UV” is misleading if not untrue. I would suggest doing more research before making such claims especially if it links to a product.

A quick online search provides many sources to dispute this claim. Here is one:

“The best type of UV protection glass that is used for automobiles is called laminated glass. It is made of 2 layers of glass and 1 plastic layer in the middle. It is able to filter out 95-99% of UV A and B rays. But it is usually only used in the front car window.

Non-laminated glass is used for side and rear windows. They do filter most of UVB; however they allow up to 60-70% UVA to pass through.

Tinting the non-laminated glass may further reduce 15-30% of UVA. You can do that with your non-laminated glass in a local auto shop but just have to make sure it allows at least 70% minimum visible light transmittance through the windshield.”

This would explain why I have more sun damage on the right side of my face than the left. I had falsely assumed that all car window glass was the same, and now we know it’s not.

Digging a bit further, we found this: “One study noted a 93 percent reduction in skin cell death when UV exposure was filtered through UV-absorbing auto glass.” Reference below.

Personally, I am tremendously relieved by this, as perhaps Michael Jackson can pull off the white glove routine, and perhaps the meticulous taxi drivers of Tokyo can also, but I am dubious anyone else can.

Thanks to Bill A and Andrew L who got it right.

Reference: Bernstein EF,Schwartz M,Veihmeyer Retal. Measurement of protection afforded by ultraviolet-absorbing window film using an in vitro model of photodamage. Lasers in Surg & Med 2006; 38(4):337-42.

See medical disclaimer below. ↓

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The ideas expressed here are solely the opinions of the author and are not researched or verified by AGEIST LLC, or anyone associated with AGEIST LLC. This material should not be construed as medical advice or recommendation, it is for informational use only. We encourage all readers to discuss with your qualified practitioners the relevance of the application of any of these ideas to your life. The recommendations contained herein are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. You should always consult your physician or other qualified health provider before starting any new treatment or stopping any treatment that has been prescribed for you by your physician or other qualified health provider. Please call your doctor or 911 immediately if you think you may have a medical or psychiatric emergency.

David Stewart
David is the founder and face of AGEIST. He is an expert on, and a passionate champion of the emerging global over-50 lifestyle. A dynamic speaker, he is available for panels, keynotes and informational talks at david@agei.st.

 

Sign up for AGEIST today
We will never sell or give your email to others. Get special info on Diet, Exercise, Sleep and Longevity.

Recommended Articles

RECENT ARTICLES

LATEST Profiles

Latest in Health Science

X